I’m going to turn back the clock on life in the United States to shortly before the 1900’s—the Victorian Era in Europe was alive and well, people were thriving and prospering, and culture was growing by leaps and bounds. That same era slowly made its way to us in the form of preferred dress, preferred morals, a gold rush, and a wild west that proved to be the engines of growth and prosperity for our own nation. Inventions and inventors sprinkled the landscape like fine dust, creating everything from the mechanical to the medical, and a lot in between.
England no longer had a debtor’s prison by this time, but lots of families had or knew of at least one member or friend that spent some time there, and children often grew up having one or both parents incarcerated. This may have been their only financial lesson about debt.
The U.S also had debtor’s prisons, but largely abandoned them as well after England abandoned hers. A few remained for all but federal debts—things like unpaid child support, alimony, or fraud. The sentences normally lasted only six weeks, but the shame lasted a lifetime.
This encouraged the use of thrift and frugality. People saved as much as they could, and spent as little as they could for fear of owing somebody and ending up in debtor’s prison. Fashions and furnishings became symbols and clues to wealth, with multitudes of ruffles, feathers, jewels, colors, and layers for clothing, and the most prized woods with the most ornate carvings (all done by hand, of course) for the well-to-do, paid for in cash, while plain, black, and ambiguous was the name of the game for the common man—think Puritan or Amish here.
Back in those days, everything was custom-made, and people often downgraded their wardrobes in order to save even more money—fewer ruffles, fewer frills, duller colors—sending signals to then-current society that some sort of misfortune beset them and their families, and occasionally encouraging sympathy from others. Because everything was custom-made, it cost a pretty penny for the day, and was paid for in cash. But what was inside the home often told the real tale: richly-carved pieces shipped in from the east coast, and lots of them—every room (and there were lots of those too) had some sort of carved piece in it, from bed frames to china closets. Even the humble washstands got the carving treatment!
Conversely, the inside of a home sometimes told the other story: straight lines and surfaces devoid of ornamentation, and the complete opposite of what the wardrobe depicted. Keeping up appearances to the public happened even back then, but the smart ones simply chose function over form.
This was only the well-to-do side of the street, but there was another side, especially for this country: the Wild West. We all pretty much remember those days thanks to books and TV shows depicting everything from prairie life to the gold rush to rip-roaring gun battles in the street.
The gold rush turned many a modest life into prosperity, and planted the seeds of barons and princes of industry and commerce. It also turned some into beggars—all because of where, when, and how they spent their wealth.
This ushered us into the Roaring Twenties, where the seeds that were planted in previous times grew and flourished, turning inventions into industries, and barons into magnates. Times were so good, a lot of “grasshoppers” got made during these times—people who lived for today, thinking this time would never end. But right over the horizon was the Great Depression, and many “grasshoppers” got turned into beggars once again, hanging on for dear life, while those who “ants” saved and sowed during prosperous times managed to survive this period with their dignity intact.
This is essentially what is happening today, and has been happening for decades: many are being turned into beggars (or worse) because of bad spending and saving habits. While the frugal lived simply, relying on necessities, they saved plenty of money to see themselves through what was commonly thought of as bad times, but were actually not. Today, we have every TV, newspaper, and internet site telling us how bad things are out there, but are they really, and for whom?
It’s bad times for the beggars among us—the grasshoppers who lived for today (through instant gratification) and didn’t put anything away for winter (winter being an expression of bad times, not as a season).
Those of us who lived frugally, even when times were good and great, are now able to pick the juiciest fruits from the trees of goods and services because we saved for this time—the harvest before our winter, if you will.
Now every TV channel and news publication is trying to tell us how to handle our failed finances, and that we should hang on and not sell off. For too many of us, this is the only lesson in finance we will ever get—this, and when Suzy Orman says on TV that you can’t afford to buy it, whatever “it” is.
Meanwhile, those of us who saved and kept our powder dry, it’s an absolute bonanza out there—stocks are cheap, merchandise is cheap, property and homes are cheap, and financing for the credit-worthy is about to get even cheaper than it is now. This is the time beggars should be buying because everything’s so affordable, but no—they lived for today yesterday and now they’re too broke to take advantage.
We savers can now afford to stock up on necessities to see us through the inevitable “worse” time that follows a “bad” time—the coming hyperinflation that usually arises when the nation’s financial belt has been loosened to the point of pants falling off. Beggars will find this point in economic time extremely hard, and many will likely die as a result of their previous excesses—just like the grasshopper in winter.
Stocking up will be a necessity in itself, because few of us will be able to afford common, everyday items we used and came to depend on regularly, and even fewer will have a way to get to those items. Convenience will become the new shame, as will the frills, novelty, and sparkle that helped to separate rich Victorians from their lesser neighbors.
You can’t sell off frills and sparkle when the going gets too tough, because there won’t be any buyers--ever try to eat a granite counter top? It can, however, be bartered, but at great loss—the value of everything will have collapsed into near-nothingness except those items we will deem essential to a frugal life. Only those will hold some sort of value in the eyes of those wanting it.
Now just think for a minute—if everyone were to become “ants” instead of “grasshoppers”, this country wouldn’t be in the position it finds itself today. Everyone from individuals to families to corporations to governments would be saving for their winter, and spending during that winter, making recessions and depressions largely a thing of the past. It would also serve to reset market rates and the perceived value of goods and services, making for a more affordable world for everyone that’s grounded in reality, and not the fictionalized financial world based on any number of phony values, phantom gains, and illusions of worth such as the world we live in today. We live in a low-tech version of the Matrix, and the blue pill is embedded in all our DNA, and the only person even close to representing Joe Sixpack is Keanu Reeves.
Today, bling is king until you go to resell it--then bling will be nothing. We were in the modern version of the Roaring Twenties, but are now entering the Great Depression all over again.
Let the grasshopper and ant story be your greatest nugget of financial wisdom: save when times are good so you have plenty of reserves to use when times are bad. Use your reserves when times are worst, so you won’t experience a winter of your discontent. Don’t become another dead or dying grasshopper—we have enough of those in this country, and they helped to bring this nation to its knees.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Wow, uh... way to make debtor's prison sound AWESOME.
You forget that a lot of the reason that fewer people in the Victorian era were in debt was because it was just harder to borrow money. There was a limit to how deeply you could dig the hole beneath yourself.
I'm not absolving personal responsibility, but I do think the deregulation of the credit industries has a lot to do with people digging themselves into debt. What is happening now is more related to the credit industries overextending themselves; making riskier investments in people who shouldn't have ever been loaned money, than it does with personal spending habits.
There's also a great deal of evidence that the people who are going through bankruptcies and foreclosures right now aren't overextending themselves on plasma TVs, but the basics of modern, middle class life - a home, food, gas, good schools. I dunno where you live, but one can't even find a starter home for less than $250K around here without giving up all pretenses of being middle class (i.e. decent school systems, not living in a trailer park).
You can't heap all the responsibility on the individual consumer in this one, when there's no "cop" keeping their best interest in hand.
YOU forget that in the Victorian era, common people didn't borrow money from banks--some were extended credit (sparingly) by individual store and shops. By and large, people back then borrowed from their families or did without and saved for it.
The debtor's prison of today is called bankruptcy, and in my mind, it doesn't go far enough to instill shame on those who don't bother to control their own finances. Especially now, there's just too many loopholes, and we have Congress to thank for it.
I live in southeast Virginia, but am looking to move further inland, to say Missouri or Texas, where the cost of living is at least 20% below where I live now. If your job allows you to transfer, you should look into doing the same, because housing prices are real cheap in the middle of the country. After spending some time on Realtor.com and Homes.com, I found plenty of houses fit for two of us and three cats for well under $100k, and some as low as $50-60k. Yeah, the homes were ugly, but isn't it the owner's job to make them pretty again once they buy, and isn't that where your equity should come from, rather than this psychologically-driven idea of market value based on what goodies already exist?
The reason why I don't buy where I am now is because I believe this market is still too high even with the downturn--there's still too much not being accounted for, like degraded services, degraded schools, the fact that this town is built on a swamp and causing every home on it to eventually succumb to foundation, sewage pipe, water pipe, and drainage problems, not to mention the Edison-era electricals that would (and should) automatically place a $20k discount on the sale price of every one. The colonial-era plumbing should peel off another $10k or so just to bring it to code. Then there's the asbestos siding inside (another $25k to abate), along with the lead paint hazards (about another $10k), and you see where I'm going with this--it's all to prop up the state property tax revenues here. These houses aren't worth even HALF of what people ask for them, or even half of what "market value" determines them to be, because the market doesn't take this stuff into account. Rather, it takes how you feel about that particular house into account instead, and a lot of us are too emotionally immature to think about this stuff, just say NO, and walk away. Instead, we're distracted by shiny things, like new cabinets, granite counters, and neutral paint, and it's all being paid for at retail prices PLUS at the closing. No one ever crawls UNDER a house when they tour it, and nobody ever opens an electrical panel until after they've bought and discovered they can't plug in two things at once.
And hardly anybody ever brings an inspector along when they tour a house, unless they've already signed a contingency clause upon making an offer.
Is it any wonder people are in the mess they're in? And the "over-priced home" consumer is just the tip of this financial crisis iceberg--I'm not going to get into the bank's part of this thing, because it extends ugly tentacles into places I'm not sure you want to go.
I am curious. Do you have any experience in bankruptcy or bankruptcy law or know the history of bankruptcy? From the tone of your article and your comment, I think not, but I would like to understand your background before I try to engage some of your statements you made.
-hazard_us
I'm proud to say that the closest I came to bankruptcy was a trip to the Consumer Credit Corp., which showed me how to handle the threatening phone calls and negotiate with credit card companies...way back in the 80's.
Regardless of the new bankruptcy laws, loopholes remain--remember, this law was made by the lawyers we call congress-critters, and every law and regulation has a backdoor or two, because THEY THEMSELVES don't want to get caught in their own laws.
The biggest loophole out there right now is the one where people use fake identities (someone else's) to get credit, or turn on utilities, or just file a change of address to shift all their mess onto perfectly innocent people, all in the name of getting stuff for free. I'm surrounded by neighbors who rent apartments, then get utilities installed, and then go out and buy furniture, then file a change of address and/or used a phony phone number to start with.
I even had a cable company guy knock on MY door looking for someone who never lived here! They got installation, but the bills kept coming to my house. The cable guy wanted to know how long I lived there and who my provider was. It turned out this person really lived down the street, but she used my house number on her "address correction."
Then you get the people who buy stuff on credit (with their own name or someone else's), then leave the state, and are effectively untraceable so long as they keep moving around. Also, there seems to be an unwritten dollar amount that just isn't worth hiring a skip-tracer or collections agent for, and that amount just gets written off as a tax loss.
There are plenty of "no credit, no problem" and "no money down" stores around here, and they get taken advantage of in the worst way.
Then there's also the spousal assets game, where people can walk away from one house on the verge of foreclosure only to buy another, cheaper one in the spouse's name. Same for credit cards, loans, etc.--if you're careful to keep everything in one spouse's name and then let it go, you still have the backstop of the other spouse's credit possibilities.
Identity theft (whole or partial) is the way around the new bankruptcy laws. It takes years for the innocent person to clear his/her name, and that's time bought by the thief to enjoy his free booty longer.
Another game, only this one involves purposely filing for bankruptcy: go out and get all the stuff you want on credit, then file for bankruptcy ON PURPOSE to avoid paying for it. Know I know the new laws are suppose to exclude things like student loans, mortgages (in most states), and a few other things I can't think of right this minute, but the rest is still just as easy to get rid of as before. Federally-related debt is the only thing you aren't supposed to be able to get out of, and that's why the student loans (Sallie Mae) and mortgages (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) are excluded.
There are also serial bankruptcy-filers, who intentionally run up debt and file for bankruptcy every 10 years. There needs to be a lifetime cap put on the filing, I think.
The old bankruptcy laws stated that "homestead law" states (Texas ad Florida) could not seize your home for bankruptcy or foreclosure if the home was your primary residence. With the new bankruptcy law, Florida dropped out of the homestead exclusion. So in Texas, legally they cannot take your house if you suddenly or intentionally stop paying your mortgage on your primary residence--this is why foreclosures are rare down there.
Great post, Wenchy.
Post a Comment